Imagine a world where a simple bus ride could transform the lives of millions of women, granting them financial freedom, better job opportunities, and even stronger family bonds. That’s exactly what Karnataka’s Shakti scheme has achieved, according to a groundbreaking survey—but it’s not without its critics. Here’s the part most people miss: while the scheme has been hailed as a game-changer, some argue it’s still not enough to address deeper systemic issues. Let’s dive in.
An independent survey of Karnataka’s Shakti free bus travel scheme for women reveals staggering results: over 91% of women reported improved financial situations, with more than 80% saving up to ₹1,000 weekly on commuting costs. This initiative, part of the government’s five guarantees, has not only boosted economic independence but also enhanced mobility and employment opportunities for women across the state. The transformative impact is undeniable—but is it sustainable?
The “Impact Evaluation of the Five Guarantees”, conducted by policy consultant Tara Krishnaswamy in partnership with Lokniti–CSDS and Indus Action Initiatives, analyzed the scheme’s effectiveness over a year. The study surveyed 6,125 women heads of households across 15 districts and conducted in-depth interviews in five, focusing on gender-specific outcomes. And this is where it gets controversial: while the scheme has been a lifeline for many, critics question whether it addresses the root causes of gender inequality or merely provides a temporary fix.
The report highlights that 96% of beneficiaries used the service, with daily wage earners saving nearly one-third of their weekly earnings. But here’s where it gets even more interesting: Shakti has redefined women’s access to employment, education, and healthcare. Approximately 83% of women reported better access to medical facilities, while an equal number noted improved family relationships due to increased visits. Nearly 72% felt more empowered, and two-thirds gained greater independence in travel decisions. Yet, some argue that these gains could be short-lived without broader societal changes.
One of the most striking findings? 19% of respondents secured new or better jobs, with districts like Chikkamagaluru (44%), Bengaluru Urban (34%), and Kolar (28%) leading the way. Women in these areas credited free bus travel for enabling them to pursue higher-paying jobs farther from home. But here’s the question: Is this enough to close the gender wage gap, or does it merely scratch the surface?
Despite its successes, the report identifies challenges like overcrowding and poor accessibility to bus stops. Over 80% of respondents found stops too far, and a similar number faced delays due to overcrowded buses. The recommendations are clear: increase bus numbers, expand routes, and improve accessibility—especially in Bengaluru Rural, where usage was the lowest at 86%. Here’s the bold take: the scheme should be rebranded to emphasize its socio-economic impact rather than being dismissed as a political freebie. But will this shift public perception?
Published on October 16, 2025, this report sparks a crucial debate. What do you think? Is the Shakti scheme a revolutionary step toward gender equality, or does it fall short of addressing deeper issues? Share your thoughts in the comments—let’s keep the conversation going!
